Security Using Compression-Encryption
History Lesson: Code Talkers
Native American code talkers were deployed by the United States Army during World
War II. The most famous role of Native Americans in World War II was performed by
the Navajo Indians. They were code talkers, using their own complex native language
to help the American troops keep their plans secret from the Japanese. Many codes
were used during the war, but the Navajo code was the only one that the Japanese
were never able to break.
The lesson learned is the communication between the senders and the receivers was coded
so no one would be able to break the communication code. With same principle, can
compression and encryption be used to create a web and mobile communication code which
no one would be able to break?
The answer is yes and it is simple, but there are a number of issues which must be resolved:
Decompression-Decryption should speed
Build bulletproof Compression-Encryption and Decompression-Decryption
Build an infinite number of Compression-Encryption Key and version similar to ID
Dynamic updates of both Compression-Encryption and Decompression-Decryption
How easily it can be integrated into any existing system
The cost of develop and maintaining such processes
Can it service the existing World Wide Web (WWW), mobile and any technologies
Security Using Compression-Encryption
According to the Forbes magazine, cyber security is expected to reach $170 Billion
by 2020. Cyber security is still a global issue and we believe we a have the answer
using Compression-Encryption. We are not the only who would be using Compression-Encryption
as a security measure, but our approach and algorithms would be a far more faster, more dynamic
and secure communication which is impossible to break. It is easily integrate into any
existing system regardless of the technologies. Our approach does not cost much to build
or integrate, but marketing it would require serious funding and support.
Briefly Describe This Use Case
Addressing Security Investors Questions and Concerns
Global Security Issues:
It seems that when it comes to security, the experts and the gurus are missing simplicity
and they keep adding more layers on the top of what is being done. Looking at starting of
the security layers after the Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) which is made up of seven
layers. There are HTTPS, firewalls, server security, sockets security (SSL),
encryption-decryption, Authentication, Authorization, application security, third party
security, other security, database security, plus whatever we did not mention.
Current Security levels Figure #1
Current Security levels as shown in Figure #1 presents the number of security levels
and the latency associated with such structure. This can be simplified with a far faster
and more secure structure.
Security is a global issue for everything electronic media, and the actor is every user and system.
Our main goal is to build a permanent practical solution which is dynamic and cost effective.
Despite all these layers and all these measures, hackers (internal and external) are
still getting into system and the latest is where institutions are paying ransoms to
get their own files decrypted on their own system. From History Lesson-Code Talkers, our
analysis is simple by building a communication media which no one would be able to
break .Such communication should be cost effective to build and integrated into any system.
One-Entry-One-Exit--Chip-to-Chip (C2C) Model:
Big Data and security vendors need to look at our proposed Chip-to-Chip (C2C) communication
and our One-Entry-One-Exit Model. Critics would be asking about development time and
cost, integration, latency and other issues. What we are proposing will eliminate most of
the security layers if not all. Communication speed would be extremely faster and latencies
would be a fraction of what exists today . We are simply adding to the International
Organization for Standardization (OSI) model two chips. An output chip before OSI sending
and an input chip after the OSI layers receiving.
One-Entry-One-Exit--Chip-to-Chip (C2C) Model #2
In short, our C2C will replace or it would be placed into any existing firewalls. The
cost of C2C would be minimal to users. The key ingredient to our C2C is our
encryption-compression algorithms. C2C will have its own memory, CPU and math-co-processors
for performance and speed. Both encryption and compression work on a bit operation and they
are executed with astonishing speed. It will run as fast as the CPU and the
math-co-processor. Each device such as a server, desktop, laptop, mobile, tablets, TV or
any electronic device will have its own unique encryption-compression ID. IDs would be
dynamically loaded in the input-output C2C chips. IDs will also be periodically changed. This
means for external access, only the authorized ID and IP will have access and will be
tracked. This can be integrated and run as a separate subsystem. It would be added as "The
Secure Gateway". It will run without interruption or conflicts. For Internal access, critical
resources may have its own C2C chip. Every device will have a separate unique ID similar to
barcode. The same ID is applied to client-consumer's laptop, desktop, mobile, tablet, TV or
any device. For example, a client-consumer's unique ID would be used to access Amazon shopping
sites for shopping and his C2C chip will check Amazon's ID(s) for receiving Amazon's web pages
on his device. This means that only Amazon pages will be allowed to his device and only his
device will access Amazon secured sites. Companies and individuals will have a registered
ID. As for privacy, companies and consumers would have "Private ID" as "Unknown".
Input and Output Data:
Our C2C can be a part of a firewall or a separate device. Regardless of C2C design, it treats
input and output data as a stream of bits. Such stream is buffered and analyzed as follows:
Input C2C Chip will store the authorized IP addresses and ID. It will identify visitors IP
and check ID. It will use ID in decrypting the input bit stream. It will decompress the
decrypted stream. It will verify the decompressed stream's validity and then it will pass
the bit stream to system.
As for output stream, it would compress the input stream first with embedded keys and then
use the ID to encrypt the compressed stream.
IDs are dynamically loaded and changed periodically so copying or using ID by hackers
would be flagged and trapped.
Hijacking both ID and IP will not help hackers since they would not be able to produce
encrypted-compressed stream. The hijackers' compressed-encrypted stream would produce garbage
data. Our compression-encryption is almost impossible to break. No visitor would be able to
bypass C2C for the following reasons:
C2C will check IP address
C2C will check ID
After IP and ID are verified, ID is used to decrypt the bit stream and then decompressed it
If the decompressed stream is missing a number of embedded key values, C2C will flag the stream and trap the visitor
What Differentiate Our C2C from Existing Security Products?
Any software team or company can create One-Entry-One-Exit plus compress-decrypt
their both the incoming and outgoing data and web pages. They can also apply our
One-Entry-One-Exit-C2C model with hardly any issues. Our main advantages are:
The speed of our compression-decompression-encryption-decryption algorithms. It works
on bits with algorithms which are simple and beyond fast. The best compressions
algorithms in the market today takes a long time and it is not practical to use.
Size of the compressed data and web pages will be less than one-third (1/3) of its
original size without any loss of accuracy.
Data streaming of on both sides of Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) layers
will be a fraction of what is running today. For example, the saving would be:
o Data transmission by 70%
o Reduce OSI Packets and Frames processing by 70%
Eliminate almost all other security layers and reduce the latency to a fraction of what exists today
Let us look at an example, where medical records such as X-Rays or Digital
Parasitological specimens images or any medical records are being shared by
several medical centers worldwide. The speed, accuracy, privacy and security
are very critical to both these medical centers and their patients. In the
case of Epidemics, Pandemics, and Outbreaks of Contagious Diseases, hackers
can take these centers and their database as hostages and ask for ransoms.
How Efficient is Our Encryption-Compression Algorithms?
We have three different algorithms, the first compression is little over 35% lossless, the
second is about 45% lossless and best is over 65% lossless. Sadly we cannot give any
further information about our trade secrets since there are millions of geniuses and
gurus who would be able to use any hint to figure out our trade secrets.